The Shocking Truth About Cops and Politics: Do Republicans and Democrats Police Differently?

Wednesday, March 4, 2025.

Police departments in the United States lean Republican. This is not exactly a shocker.

If you had to bet your life savings on whether the average cop was more likely to watch a NASCAR race or sip an oat milk latte at a poetry reading, you’d be making a pretty safe investment.

But does this political tilt mean Republican officers police differently than their Democratic colleagues?

The answer might surprise you.

An epic, groundbreaking study in the American Journal of Political Science set out to answer this question with an ambitious data grab that would make the NSA proud.

Researchers sifted through voter registration records and police personnel files across 99 of the 100 largest local law enforcement agencies in the country.

(One agency, presumably, still communicates exclusively through carrier pigeons.) What they found was that about 32% of officers were registered Republicans, compared to just 14% of voting-age civilians in their jurisdictions.

Police officers were also whiter, wealthier, and significantly more likely to actually vote than the people they serve—so basically, your overachieving uncle at Thanksgiving dinner.

Do Republican Cops Crack Down Harder Than Democrats?

Given that policing in America is as much a topic of partisan warfare as taxes, healthcare, and whether pineapple belongs on pizza, the researchers wanted to know: Does a cop’s political affiliation determine how they do their job?

Are Republican officers more likely to crack down with a law-and-order approach while Democratic officers hand out hugs and write citations with a quill pen?

Surprisingly, the answer is no.

To get a clearer picture, the researchers turned to Chicago and Houston—two cities that, despite their differing political and cultural vibes, have one thing in common: a whole lot of policing data.

They dug into detailed records of traffic stops, arrests, and use-of-force incidents, cross-referencing them with the officers’ party registrations.

And what they found was a whole lot of… nothing.

When Republican and Democratic officers worked the same shifts, in the same neighborhoods, under the same conditions, their policing patterns were nearly identical. It turns out that a cop’s training, professional incentives, and the general soul-sucking grind of bureaucracy matter a lot more than whether they voted for Biden or Trump.

The Real Divide in Policing: Race Over Politics

But before you break out the bipartisan celebration banners, the study did find one interesting wrinkle: race and ethnicity mattered far more than political affiliation.

In both Chicago and Houston, Black and Hispanic officers consistently made fewer stops and arrests than their white counterparts.

Black officers also used force less often.

This suggests that, while partisanship might not shape day-to-day policing, an officer’s lived experience—particularly their racial background—does.

There was, however, one tiny partisan quirk: in Chicago, white Democratic officers actually arrested more people for violent crimes than their white Republican colleagues.

This little twist seems to contradict the typical stereotype that Republicans are the tough-on-crime party. Maybe it’s the liberal guilt. Maybe it’s just Chicago. Either way, it was one of the few meaningful partisan differences the study could dig up.

Why This Matters: Trust, Bias, and the Future of Policing

Of course, the study has its limitations.

It focused only on two cities, so there may be places where partisanship does play a role in policing.

There are, after all, 18,000 law enforcement agencies in the U.S., each with its own culture, policies, and preferred brand of mediocre office coffee.

Researchers also acknowledged that while they controlled for many factors, policing is a complex and messy business, full of human subjectivity.

There’s still plenty more to study, particularly regarding how different officers are perceived by the communities they police and whether these political divides influence long-term public trust.

Still, the takeaway here is both reassuring and mildly disappointing, depending on how much you were hoping for a grand, politically driven conspiracy.

Cops, like most professionals, tend to do their jobs in ways that reflect their training and institutional norms more than their personal beliefs. And while police departments as a whole may lean Republican, the study suggests that when officers hit the streets, their decisions are shaped less by their voter registration and more by the ingrained rhythms of the profession.

So, while your local officer may have a Trump sticker (or a Biden one) on their personal truck, odds are, it’s not going to dictate whether you get a ticket or a warning when they pull you over for rolling that stop sign. But if they’re white, Black, or Hispanic? That, unfortunately, still seems to make a difference.

Final Thoughts: The Need for Better Data and Reform

Despite its limitations, this study is one of the most comprehensive analyses of political affiliation within law enforcement to date.

It raises important questions about who we recruit into police forces, how training and experience shape their behaviors, and what role unconscious biases might play.

Future research should expand to more cities and dig deeper into how these dynamics impact trust between police and communities.

The debate over policing will rage on, but at least we now know one thing for sure: whether an officer is a Republican or a Democrat is far less important than their training, their lived experiences, and—if we’re being honest—how many paperwork-avoiding shortcuts they’ve learned over the years.

So, next time you get pulled over, don’t worry about whether the cop is a Democrat or a Republican. Just hope they’re having a good day.

Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed.

RESEARCH: