How to Communicate Across Cultural Differences: Tips for International Couples
Sunday, October 13, 2024.
Relationships are always a journey, but when you and your partner come from different cultural backgrounds, that journey becomes even more exciting and layered.
Navigating cultural differences can lead to incredible growth and understanding in a relationship, but it also presents unique challenges.
From varying approaches to communication and emotional expression to different values surrounding time and gender roles, these cultural nuances can sometimes cause misunderstandings.
The good news? With empathy, open-mindedness, and the right tools, international couples can turn these differences into strengths, building a more profound connection.
In this post, we’ll dive into key cultural differences and offer practical tips on how to communicate effectively across these divides.
Understanding Communication Styles: High-Context vs. Low-Context
Communication is at the heart of every relationship. But in international couples, communication styles can differ widely based on cultural backgrounds. Understanding these styles is the first step to bridging any gaps.
High-Context Cultures (e.g., Japan, China, India) rely on indirect communication, where much of the meaning comes from context, non-verbal cues, and shared understanding. In these cultures, people may avoid direct confrontation or overly explicit statements to maintain harmony and respect.
Low-Context Cultures (e.g., United States, Germany, Australia) are more direct, where clarity and explicitness are highly valued. People tend to say exactly what they mean, and open, honest communication is often seen as a sign of respect.
For international couples, these differences can sometimes cause friction. One partner may expect subtle hints, while the other is looking for direct statements.
Cultivating cultural empathy can help—taking the time to understand your partner’s communication style, rather than assuming bad intentions, can lead to more harmonious conversations.
According to Ting-Toomey (1999), learning to navigate high- and low-context communication styles is crucial for improving intercultural relationships.
Emotional Expression: Finding the Right Balance
How we express emotions—whether it’s joy, frustration, or affection—can vary significantly from culture to culture. In international relationships, it’s important to recognize these differences and find a comfortable balance that works for both partners.
Expressive Cultures (e.g., Mediterranean, Latin American, Middle Eastern) encourage open emotional expression. People from these cultures often display affection, anger, or joy openly and feel comfortable expressing their feelings in real-time.
Restrained Cultures (e.g., Scandinavian, East Asian, Northern European) value emotional control and reserve. In these cultures, people tend to express emotions more privately or subtly, believing that emotional restraint is a sign of maturity and respect.
For couples where one partner comes from an expressive culture and the other from a more reserved one, miscommunication can occur.
One partner may feel overwhelmed by emotional displays, while the other feels unsupported by the lack of visible emotion. The key here is open dialogue—talking about your emotional needs and learning to appreciate your partner’s way of expressing feelings.
Research by Matsumoto and Juang (2016) shows that emotional expression is deeply cultural but can be negotiated in relationships through empathy and understanding.
Time Orientation: The Monochronic vs. Polychronic Divide
Cultural attitudes toward time can also impact communication in international relationships. This difference can be a source of tension if couples don’t address it early on.
Monochronic Cultures (e.g., United States, Germany, Switzerland) view time as linear and prioritize punctuality, schedules, and deadlines. Time is treated as a limited resource, and efficiency is highly valued.
Polychronic Cultures (e.g., Latin America, Africa, Middle Eastern countries) have a more flexible relationship with time. In these cultures, the emphasis is placed on relationships rather than schedules, and people may handle multiple tasks simultaneously or prioritize social interactions over strict timeliness.
Imagine the possibilities. If one partner comes from a monochronic culture and the other from a polychronic one, misunderstandings can arise around lateness or scheduling.
The partner from a monochronic culture may feel disrespected by lateness, while the polychronic partner may feel constrained by rigid schedules.
The solution?
Cultural flexibility and understanding. Research by Kim (2001) highlights the importance of adapting one’s perspective to respect each partner’s time orientation. By being patient and finding a middle ground, couples can avoid time-related tensions.
Gender Roles: Navigating Different Expectations
Cultural norms around gender roles can influence how couples communicate and share responsibilities in their relationship. Different cultures have varying expectations about how men and women should act in relationships, which can impact communication patterns.
Traditional Gender Role Cultures (e.g., many Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African cultures) often emphasize distinct roles for men and women. In these relationships, men may be expected to take on more assertive or decision-making roles, while women are seen as nurturing or focused on family.
Egalitarian Cultures (e.g., Scandinavian, North American) emphasize gender equality. In these cultures, both partners are expected to contribute equally to decision-making, financial responsibilities, and household tasks.
When couples come from different cultural backgrounds with contrasting views on gender roles, it’s important to have open discussions about expectations and values.
Hofstede’s (2001) research on masculinity versus femininity in cultural dimensions explains how gender roles shape communication, and how couples can learn to find a balance that honors both partners' values.
Power Distance: Different Approaches to Authority
In addition to gender roles, how cultures view authority—whether in families, workplaces, or relationships—can also affect communication in international couples. This concept is known as power distance, and it describes how much a culture values hierarchy and authority.
High Power Distance Cultures (e.g., India, Russia, Malaysia) place a strong emphasis on respecting authority and hierarchy. In these cultures, individuals often defer to those in higher positions, whether that’s in families or society. Partners from these cultures may expect decisions to be made by the more authoritative partner.
Low Power Distance Cultures (e.g., Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand) value equality, and authority is less pronounced. Relationships in these cultures tend to be more egalitarian, with both partners equally contributing to decisions and discussions.
If one partner comes from a high power distance culture and the other from a low power distance culture, there may be misunderstandings about decision-making and authority within the relationship. Discussing these expectations early on can help couples find a middle ground that works for them.
Non-Verbal Communication: More Than Words
Communication isn’t just about words. Non-verbal cues—such as body language, facial expressions, and physical touch—are equally important but vary widely across cultures.
Expressive Non-Verbal Cultures (e.g., Italy, Brazil, Greece) use hand gestures, facial expressions, and physical touch to communicate. In these cultures, being physically expressive is a natural extension of conversation, and it’s common to hug or touch others while speaking.
Restrained Non-Verbal Cultures (e.g., Japan, Germany, Korea) tend to be more reserved in their body language. Physical touch is less common, and people may use facial expressions or gestures sparingly, especially in formal settings.
Understanding your partner’s non-verbal communication style is crucial. If one partner is more physically expressive and the other more reserved, there can be confusion or discomfort. Learning to interpret non-verbal cues from different cultures can help bridge this gap and enhance communication.
Tips for Communicating Across Cultural Differences
Practice Active Listening
Actively listening to your partner—without interrupting or jumping to conclusions—can help clear up misunderstandings. Nichols (2009) found that active listening fosters deeper emotional connections, especially in cross-cultural contexts.Be Open to Learning About Each Other’s Culture
Show genuine curiosity about your partner’s cultural background. By learning about their customs, communication norms, and traditions, you foster trust and mutual respect. Gudykunst and Kim (2003) emphasize that understanding each other’s cultural background reduces uncertainty and improves communication.Avoid Making Assumptions
Don’t assume that your partner’s behavior or words carry the same meaning they would in your culture. Instead, ask questions and clarify. Spitzberg and Cupach (1984) highlight that avoiding assumptions leads to stronger, healthier relationships.Create Your Own Shared Culture
As an international couple, you have the unique opportunity to blend elements from both of your cultures. Create rituals, communication patterns, and values that honor both backgrounds. Canary and Stafford (1992) found that couples who develop shared rituals report greater relationship satisfaction.
Embracing Differences, Building Connection
Navigating cultural differences in communication may feel challenging, but it’s also an incredible opportunity for growth in international relationships.
With curiosity about varying communication styles, emotional expression, time orientation, gender roles, and non-verbal cues, couples might better foster empathy, patience, and deeper connection.
International couples bring together the richness of two worlds. By embracing these differences and committing to open, compassionate communication, you can build a stronger, more resilient relationship that thrives on diversity.
Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed.
REFERENCES:
Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication(4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.